Examine the laws and regulations governing White collar crime in India
Pranita Dhara
Lloyd Law College
This Article is written by Pranita Dhara, a Third-year law student of Lloyd Law College


Abstract:
People who engage in minor offenses confined to specific administrative areas are categorized by researchers as "herbivores." In contrast, "meat eaters" are prevalent across various sectors and are implicated in white-collar crimes. The rise in white-collar crime can be attributed to advancements in technology and education, often exploited by professionals who navigate legal loopholes, with subtle support from governmental entities. These connections have led to the formation of organized groups that participate in white-collar criminal activities while enjoying legal protections. Consequently, some individuals in lower-tier positions have transitioned into roles as white-collar criminals.
Regarding India, the frequency of white-collar crime quickly penetrates all parts of society. Defilement, an unmistakable type of white-collar crime, is a subject of successive conversation across friendly, financial, and political spaces. Nevertheless, significant measures to address this issue remain largely absent. This essay aims to define white-collar crime, examine its historical evolution, and propose potential solutions to this pressing problem. The concept of white-collar crime is not new; in ancient societies, the absence of a formal criminal justice system meant that retributive justice was the norm, encapsulated in the principle of "Tooth for tooth, life for life"[1]. Public outrage has historically contributed to the proliferation of deceitful practices. Currently, a novel form of culpability, termed "cabin injury," is emerging as a consequence of scientific progress and its implications.
Keywords:
White-Collar, Criminal Law, Economy, Money Laundering, Commercial Bills.
Introduction:
“Those who engage in malevolent practices, including hoarders, profiteers, black market operators, and speculators, represent the most significant adversaries to our societal well-being. They have to be dealt with sternly. However well placed important and influential they may be, if we acquiesce in wrongdoing, people will lose faith in us.”
-Dr. S. Radhakrishnan [2]
During the 1930s, the crime analyst and social scientist Edwin Sutherland presented the idea of "white-collar crime." This term was utilized to portray offenses normally executed by people considered to hold a high societal position, whom he alluded to as "people of decency." Consequently, Sutherland established the Bloomington School of Criminal science at Indiana State College.
The commonness of these wrongdoings is quite high in non-industrial countries, to a great extent owing to monetary circumstances. For instance, India's positioning in the simplicity of carrying on with work worked on by almost 37 situations somewhere in the range of 2018 and 2020, working with expanded speculation and business action. Be that as it may, this monetary development has at the same time compromised buyer freedoms, bringing about a stunning 80% ascent in revealed cases in 2019 alone. Edwin Sutherland placed that white-collar crime represents a more prominent danger to society than regular offenses, basically because of the critical monetary repercussions for people in general. The starting points of white-collar crime can be followed back to the fifteenth hundred years in the Unified Realm and later in the US during the Nationwide conflict, which empowered the ascent of syndications and required the execution of antitrust regulation to defend shopper interests and advance fair contest. As the world advances in mechanical and business headway, India shows up unfit to deal with the remarkable development, prompting an increase in white-collar offenses, including cybercrime. This present circumstance further infers that such crimes can rise above public boundaries. The rising simplicity of executing these offenses has encouraged fraudsters, bringing about a more youthful segment participating in these exercises, worked with by their admittance to and capability with innovation. Thus, the ascent in white-collar crime signals a disturbing pattern for the eventual fate of the country.
White Collar Crime in India:
Defilement, misrepresentation, and payoff address probably the most pervasive types of white-collar crime in India and all around the world. A report distributed by the Business Standard on November 22, 2016, named "The Changing Elements of white-collar crime in India," demonstrated that over the last 10 years, the Focal Department of Examination (CBI) has revealed a sum of 6,533 defilement cases, with 517 of these cases enlisted over the most recent two years alone.
Information uncovered that exchanges adding up to 4,000 crores were directed utilizing fake or copy Container cards. Maharashtra encountered a huge flood in web-based crimes, with 999 cases detailed. Besides, the report featured that around 3.2 million people brought about misfortunes because of the robbery of their card data from YES Bank ATMs, which Hitachi Installment Administrations oversaw.
The development of business and innovation has prompted a phenomenal ascent in a particular classification of white-collar crime known as cybercrime. The expansion in cybercrimes can be credited to the generally okay of recognition or misgiving. Remarkably, India's situation on Transparency International's Corruption Perception Index (CPI) has shown improvement throughout the long term.
In 2014, India was positioned 85th, which improved to 76th in 2015 because of different drives pointed toward fighting white-collar crimes. As per a report by The Financial Times in 2018, India was positioned 78th, mirroring a three-point improvement from 2017 among a sum of 180 nations.
As a non-industrial country, India faces huge difficulties from white-collar crime, which adds to its underdevelopment close by issues like neediness and well-being. The continuous pattern of white-collar violations represents a significant danger to the country's monetary advancement. The public authority should mediate instantly by sanctioning rigid laws and guaranteeing their powerful implementation.[3]
Types of white-collar crime in India:
The extent of white-collar crimes is broad. Among the white-collar offenses that have been archived in India are:
Blackmail:
Section 503 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) of 1860, presently renumbered as Section 351 in the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) of 2023, portrays coercion or criminal terrorizing as the demonstration of requesting cash or different advantages through the danger of causing actual mischief, harming property, erroneously blaming a person for crimes, or uncovering secret data about somebody.[4]
Credit card frauds:
Visa misrepresentation happens when an individual unlawfully uses someone else's Mastercard to procure important merchandise, in this way committing an offense against the cardholder. A striking example of this was in 2003, when Amit Tiwari, a 21-year-old design understudy in Mumbai, was secured for working various made-up characters, keeping up with various false financial balances, and beguiling a Mumbai-based charge card organization, CC Road, bringing about a deficiency of roughly 900,000 rupees.
This occurrence featured a huge oversight in the Data Innovation Demonstration of 2000, as Visa extortion was not sufficiently tended to inside the regulation, prompting significant monetary repercussions for the impacted organization.
As per a report by the Financial Times, between April and September 2018, north of 900 episodes of credit and check card misrepresentation, as well as web-banking extortion, were recorded, each including totals surpassing 100,000 rupees. S.S. Ahluwalia, the Priest of State for Gadgets and IT in 2018, revealed that by September 30, 2018, the Hold Bank of India had recorded a sum of 921 instances of credit and charge card misrepresentation.
In a different occurrence in 2017, a Metropolitan Judge succumbed to credit/check card misrepresentation when he got warnings for two exchanges made with his charge card, which happened abroad as opposed to inside India. The casualty stated that he had not approved these exchanges, prompting a grievance of tricking under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, or 318 of BNS,2023.
Currency Schemes:
These schemes fundamentally pertain to the practice of forecasting the future value of currency. However, this valuation process lacks a foundation in substantial evidence.
A report titled ‘Trend and Progress of Banking in India,’ published by the Reserve Bank of India and featured in the Financial Express in January 2019, indicated that banks incurred losses amounting to 41,168 crore rupees during the financial year 2018, reflecting a 72% increase compared to 2017. This surge is attributed to fraudulent activities associated with currency schemes. The report highlighted that fraud has emerged as a significant issue, with a 90% increase in such incidents within the banks' credit portfolios, predominantly affecting off-balance sheet operations, foreign exchange transactions, deposit accounts, and cyber-security measures.
Insider trading:
Insider exchanging alludes to the demonstration of participating in monetary exchanges in light of secret data that furnishes the dealer with an unreasonable edge on the lookout. For instance, a representative at a speculation bank might realize that Organization X wants to secure Organization Y. This representative could then buy partakes in Organization Y, guessing that the stock cost will altogether increment once the procurement is freely reported.
Ponzi scheme:
Charles Ponzi is perceived as the originator of the Ponzi plot, a type of venture misrepresentation that ensures financial backers uncommonly exceptional yields. These profits are dispensed to early financial backers from the capital contributed by resulting financial backers. When the fraudster neglects to enlist an adequate number of new financial backers to satisfy the commitments to prior ones, the plan eventually falls, bringing about significant monetary misfortunes for some members.
Identity theft and computer:
Cybercrime includes different illegal exercises, among which "hacking" and personality misrepresentation are especially pervasive. In the US, it is expected that the monetary repercussions of wholesale fraud will outperform $2 billion out of 2019. California encountered the most elevated occurrence of such wrongdoings, with roughly 73,000 revealed cases, while Florida chased after altogether behind with 37,000 examples.
Theft:
Misappropriation is a type of burglary that is frequently inseparable from theft. Occasions of misappropriation can differ fundamentally, including situations, for example, a representative stealing a little total from a sales register to additional modern plans including the misappropriation of millions of dollars from an organization's monetary assets into the records of the culprit.
Difference between white-collar crime and blue-collar crime:
The idea of "blue-collar crime" arose during the 1920s, at first portraying people in the US who participated in physical work. These laborers normally preferred more obscure attire to hide smudges, with some explicitly wearing blue-busted shirts. They were many times repaid on an hourly premise at lower wage rates. Interestingly, white-collar violations have existed for quite a long time, penetrating different areas, callings, and enterprises.
The distinction between "blue-collar crimes," which are generally straightforward offenses, and "white-collar crimes" was articulated by the Supreme Court of India in the case of State of Gujarat v. Mohanlal Jitamalji Porwal and Anr.[5] Justice Thakker clarified that while a person may commit murder impulsively, the perpetration of financial crimes or economic offenses necessitates careful planning. Such acts require strategic thinking and calculations aimed at achieving personal gain.
Blue-collar crimes are related to people participating in difficult work, using their actual abilities, while White-collar violations relate to the people who influence their scholarly skill to execute unlawful exercises.
The presence of both mens rea and actus reus is essential for the establishment of a criminal offense. While mens rea is a critical component in the context of blue-collar crimes, its necessity is not as pronounced in the realm of white-collar crimes.[6]
Causes of white-collar crime in India:
India is a country faced with various huge difficulties, including inescapable starvation, lack of education, and broad well-being concerns. Moreover, as the second most crowded country internationally, overseeing such a tremendous populace presents extensive hardships. Even though there are severe regulations set up, the requirement of these guidelines habitually misses the mark, as keeping everything under control among such a huge number of people ends up being a complicated errand. In this specific circumstance, the pervasiveness of white-collar crimes is probably going to increase. Coming up next are a few elements adding to the ascent of white-collar crimes in India:
· white-collar crimes are executed by people who have monetary solidness and participate in such unlawful exercises to fulfill their longings. These offenses are prevalently driven by the eagerness of the criminals.
· In India, destitution is broadly perceived as a critical variable adding to underdevelopment. It incites both monetary and actual difficulty for a significant part of the populace. As people wrestle with financial need, they frequently succumb to misleading cases, forgetting to check the credibility of the data introduced to them.
· The seriousness of white-collar crimes outperforms that of customary offenses, bringing about extensive misfortunes across different aspects, including monetary and close-to-home repercussions. Corporate embarrassments, like false drug testing, can prompt a more noteworthy death toll than demonstrations of crime.
· The fast progression of innovation, combined with sped-up modern development and political tensions, has furnished wrongdoers with creative, more effective methods for executing these violations.
· The appearance of the web and the advanced scene, where significant exchanges can happen immediately and worldwide correspondence is promptly open, has inspired hoodlums to participate in additional unlawful exercises while avoiding discovery.
Laws against white collar crime in India:
Various provisions have been established to identify white-collar crime. To ensure that individuals engaging in such criminal activities are held accountable, the government has enacted the following legislation:
1. The Companies Act, legislated in 1960,
2. The Income Tax Act, established in 1961,
3. The Indian Penal Code, formulated in 1860 (now its BNS 2023),
4. The Commodities Act, introduced in 1955,
5. The Prevention of Corruption Act, enacted in 1988,
6. The Negotiable Instruments Act, created in 1881,
7. The Prevention of plutocrat Laundering Act, which was established in 2002, serves as a legislative frame aimed at combating plutocrat laundering conditioning.
8. The Information Technology Act, introduced in 2005,
9. The significances and Exports (Control) Act, established in 1950,
10. The Special Court (Trial of Offences Relating to Deals in Securities) Act, legislated in 1992, and
11. The Central Vigilance Commission Act was introduced in 2003.
Some important legislations and their flaws:
Prevention of Money-laundering Act,2005:
This law has fundamentally added to the decrease of homegrown illegal tax avoidance exercises and has additionally broadened its span universally, tending to tax evasion-related tasks considering severe unfamiliar trade guidelines. In the same way as other white-collar crimes, this issue normally includes various members. In any case, the appearance of innovation has both improved these activities and delivered them more complex and advanced. The rise of digital currency stages has presented a clever strategy for tax evasion, empowering crooks to move reserves quickly and proficiently across the globe with insignificant exertion. Sadly, existing lawful structures have not advanced adequately to address these quick innovative turns of events.
Prevention of Corruption (Amendment) Act 2018:
The sanctioning arranged in 1988 highlighted battle degradation in India, and the rectifications introduced in 2018 have worked on its suitability. Regardless, these changes need to happen in deferred preliminary structures and require the obtainment of approval to start assessments against open specialists. Also, the onus of affirmation as of now rests with the arraignment, which can be particularly precarious in events of degradation including senior specialists. This situation reasonably gives a guarded limit for such individuals, as the extended length of genuine methods might engage them to abuse legitimate getaway provisos, hence uplifting the evasion of value in specific cases.
White collar crime cases in India:
Abhay Singh Chautala v. C.B.I. 2011[7]:
In the current matter, there are two appellants against whom a charge sheet has been submitted for offenses under Section 13(1)(e) and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, in conjunction with Section 109 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, and now Section 40 in BNS,2023, in separate proceedings. The allegations suggest that both individuals amassed wealth that was disproportionate to their declared income during their tenure as members of the Legislative Assembly.
Upon the initiation of an investigation by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), it was revealed that the father of one of the appellants had acquired substantial properties, a situation mirrored by the appellants themselves. The High Court determined that the appellants had presented a significantly different account of the positions held by the accused at that time. Consequently, the sanction issued under Section 19 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, was deemed to lack merit.
Binod Kumar v. State of Jharkhand & Others[8]
In the current matter, there are two appellants against whom a charge sheet has been submitted for offenses under Section 13(1)(e) and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, in conjunction with Section 109 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, in separate proceedings. The allegations suggest that both individuals amassed wealth that was disproportionate to their declared income during their tenure as members of the Legislative Assembly.
Upon the initiation of an investigation by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), it was revealed that the father of one of the appellants had acquired substantial properties, a situation mirrored by the appellants themselves. The High Court determined that the appellants had presented a significantly different account of the positions held by the accused at that time. Consequently, the sanction issued under Section 19 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, was deemed to lack merit.
Conclusion:
White-collar crimes exhibit two notable characteristics: firstly, they are inherently non-violent offenses, despite the perpetrators often exhibiting a sense of entitlement or a desire for control; secondly, these crimes are predominantly perpetrated by individuals in elevated professional positions. Nonetheless, it is important to recognize that individuals in lower-paying roles may also engage in such criminal activities, often under the influence of a more affluent mastermind who holds a prestigious status within their field. The occurrence of white-collar crimes is frequently influenced by peer pressure and the prevailing corporate culture.
The media plays a crucial role in mitigating the rise of white-collar crimes. Research indicates that a substantial number of these offenses remain unreported. Therefore, if the media takes a more proactive stance in exposing frauds and scams at elevated levels, and highlights the arbitrary use of power by individuals in senior positions within corporations, while also educating the public about white-collar crimes and promoting ethical practices, it could significantly contribute to a decre
REFERENCES
[1] Tooth for tooth, life for life< https://www.bibleref.com/Matthew/5/Matthew-5-38.html >accessed 04 September 2024
[2] However well placed important and influential they may be, if we acquiesce in wrongdoing, people will lose faith in us.” -Dr. S. Radhakrishnan < TOP 25 QUOTES BY SARVEPALLI RADHAKRISHNAN | A-Z Quotes (azquotes.com) > accessed 05September 2024
[3] White Collar Crime < India: White Collar Crime – Country Comparative Guides (legal500.com) > accessed 05 September 2024
[4] Section of Criminal laws “CORE CRIMINAL LAW SUBJECTS” < United States Courts | (uscourts.gov)> accessed 05 September 2024
[5] Gujarat v. Mohanlal Jitamalji Porwal and Anr.< indiankanoon.org/doc/90919629/ > accessed 06 September 2024
[6] Acts Reus & Mens Rea < JETIR2403533.pdf > accessed 06 September 2024
[7]V.S. Sirpurkar, Supreme Court of India, "Abhay Singh Chautala vs C.B.I on 4 July 2011" < https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1342360/ > accessed 07 September 2024
[8]Supreme Court of India, "Binod Kumar vs State Of Jharkhand & Ors on 29 March 2011"< https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1930072/ > accessed 07 September 2024